Pop goes the doctor ([info]doctorpop) wrote,
@ 2007-10-22 12:53:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
tv
Television lately

Well.

Mad Men turned out excellently, to lead with the good. In the end, though I like the high points of Friday Night Lights (first season) better, Mad Men has hardly any (= "I can't think of any") low points, while FNL had three or four. Arguably the best show of the year, then. Definitely one I'll be buying.

Desperate Housewives continues the night-time-soap tradition of rewriting characters to suit plot needs, but there's no J.R. Ewing in this Dallas, no Erica Kane, no unchanging center -- as much as they act like Susan is that center, she's been inconsistent since last season. Maybe Bree is the closest. In any case, the Dana Delaney plot is already more interesting than anything in last season, even if it does appear to maintain the pattern of "parents have deep dark secret about child, which turns out to be a sacrifice they made for the child's own good."

Pushing Daisies shot way up in my estimation with the third episode, the first one not directed by Barry Sonnenfeld (barred from directing any more because he kept going way over budget with the special effects and those damn sets). It's the first episode to make the characters seem like people, though I'm not sure they're people I like.

Now the bad ...

Heroes, How I Met Your Mother, and The Office have all lost a significant portion of my interest, though I'm expecting The Office to improve when they leave the supersized episodes behind.

Reaper, after the second-strongest pilot of the season (trailing Sarah Connor), became an unfortunately boring show with a couple engaging performances.

Friday Night Lights disappoints me every week, the moreso because every episode has excellent moments in it. It's not just the Tyra-Landry plot. It's the black-and-white characterization of the replacement coach (played by Hank from Twin Peaks, someone ideally suited to shades of grey), and the way that seems to make Taylor's return inevitable. It's the fact that everyone seems a little off except Buddy, Tami, and maybe Eric -- and even then, I'm not sure Buddy is reacting as strongly to Newcoach as he ought to be, given the shit he gave Eric last year over very minor slights.

Bill Simmons -- another FNL fan disappointed with the new season -- says once your team wins the championship, you have five years in which you can't complain about anything they do. First season of Friday Night Lights was unquestionably a World Series win, but in the world of television, what does five years scale down to? Half a season? A full season?


(Post a new comment)


[info]amanofhats
2007-10-22 05:35 pm UTC (link)
Five episodes.

I quite enjoyed last season of Desperate Housewives which makes me curious as to how much watching it all in one week changed the experience for me.

This season has three things working against it: Cancer, Baby, and Baby. Both bring ultimate life or death decisions to shows that are designed, predominantly, without a set end. So, either Lynette will die or she won't. Where do you go from there? If she dies, a beloved character is gone. And for a show set upon five pillars, I'm not sure it can afford to just knock one of those pillars down. If she lives, it becomes trivia. ("Hey, remember when Lynette had cancer?" "Yeah." "Huh. Me too.") The Scavos are getting short shrift this season and that saddens me. Their business is still within its first year and we haven't seen shit regarding the trials and tribulations of that.

With the babies, it's the same. Either the baby lives or dies (in the womb or out). If the baby dies, the character deal with the relationship fallout (which I find to be a very sick horse that doesn't need beaten anymore) or the baby lives and we all have to stare at the stroller that's turned away from the camera because, hey she had a baby right but we don't want to deal with baby stuff this episode so she's going to quietly sleep through it, or the baby is never seen which leads either to the introduction of a nanny (fifth season's secret bearer?!) who, when in the focus, is only tangentially on-duty, or, when out of focus, is a convenient reason for the writers not to deal with the child.

I...I just have issues with cancer and babies in shows. It rarely, man ever?, works out well.

See, for me, Lynette was the center. And she's being misused so far this season.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]doctorpop
2007-10-22 05:58 pm UTC (link)
Yeah, Lynette is damn near an antagonist this year. She was the everywoman in a lot of ways, in first season -- maybe her and Susan together, though I realize that's not what everywoman means. This year, when Tom says things like "I just wanted to make love to someone who wasn't sick," or Lynette gets all perturbed yet again about normal 15-years-married(?) issues and they write her like she thinks she's the victim of something, I start to approach the point where I like him less for being married to her. They used to balance that. She was worn out from mothering and often wasn't at her best -- that came through. More and more they write her like "her best" is a thing of the past.

Come to think of it, have we seen the restaurant once this year? Are they doing that thing, where last year they had a restaurant and this year they have cancer and next year Lynette's brother will die and Cousin Oliver will come to live with them?

It's sort of like a sophomore album -- I thought first season was very well-plotted, with next to no extraneous material, while second season felt like they kept jumping all over the place trying to see what would attract the audience's attention. This year at least feels like there's a plan in place, even if most of the plan is stuff I don't care for (I like Bree's handling of her family, just not, as you say, the consequences of the baby plot; and Susan's weird sitcommy reaction to her gay neighbors seemed weird and ... sitcommy).

I also kind of wish Edie had died, because in retrospect the suicide attempt now feels like a cheap shot -- not only by the character (can we really feel sympathetic for her now that she's faked a suicide attempt to get attention?) but by the show.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]amanofhats
2007-10-22 06:13 pm UTC (link)
I really wish Edie had died and that she was narrating this season. Edie went through a really sympathetic streak at the end of last season (see: her "strip" for Carlos) but that has been completely, utterly destroyed this season. ("Carlos is cheating on me!" "Yep, cuz you're a crazy bitch.")

No, I don't think they've said more than three lines regarding the restaurant (One of the ovens broke? I bet that caused some problems at the restaurant. Boy, I would've liked to see that.)

I was talking with my wife regarding all this. She has far more trust in the writers to work past the plots than I do. If Susan has the baby, what's she gonna do? Leave the kid on top of the dryer so its brain gets scrambled? Leave it in a car during a hot day? They've reduced Susan Mayer to Jack Tripper meets Chrissy Snow and it's fucking old. She's only redeemed by Julie and Mike and they don't get enough screen time.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]doctorpop
2007-10-22 08:30 pm UTC (link)
You can have Susan as the mother of a teenager and it works. That Susan can still accidentally burn Edie's house down, because her daughter is the Good Kid on the show and probably has more on the ball than most of the adults. But make her the mother of a newborn, and ... I don't know. That just plays out differently.

Susan really suffers the most, I think, in terms of characterization. She's whatever the plot needs her to be. That's not "three-dimensional," that's ill-defined. I'd kind of rather let characters fall by the wayside for a few episodes -- which is what daytime soaps do! -- than have them act out of character just to give them something to do.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


Create an Account
Forgot your login?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…